It is common for changes to be made on orders even after production has begun.
Many factories build in enough time and flexibility to manage these changes
without unfairly burdening workers. Unfortunately, some cannot, which may lead
to violations of our Code
of Vendor Conduct.
In 2005, we began exploring how we could better address this issue. Through
our membership in the Ethical
Trading Initiative (ETI), we started working with Women
Working Worldwide (WWW), a non-governmental organization, to better
understand how our purchasing practices can impact working conditions and how
we can improve. WWW met with our employees, factory management and workers to
understand our planning and production process and its impact on factories.
WWW's preliminary report, completed in 2006, showed that we face many of the
same challenges as others in our industry. It identified what we do well, and
what we can do better. The report also demonstrated how managing the
production process differently in key areas could help reduce quality problems
and cost, as well as some of the adverse impacts on workers.
Among the key findings:
|
|
Inefficient purchasing practices clearly impact labor standards at the factory
level.
|
|
|
Some delays and changes unnecessarily complicate the production process.
|
|
|
Poor production planning by factory management can also negatively impact
working conditions.
|
Learn
more (PDF) about the key findings from WWW's report.